Speed Fines are Government Profit-making Schemes
Everything below is based on my own personal opinions, speculations, logical calculations and experience.
Speed Awareness courses, here in Britain, follow a similar pattern to everything else we’ve detected over the past few years: They exploit our fundamental and inherent desire to protect members of our community, in order to drive profit for those who couldn’t give a shit about our community or health.
Having recently attended a Speed Awareness course, I can confirm that it was delivered by a very nice guy; a member of our community, and it involved the presentation of information that was geared towards convincing us that our (the members of the session) behaviour had been a potential risk to innocent people and children who could’ve been injured as a result of our speeding.
The message here, of course, is entirely undermined by the fact that for the past few years, our politicians have been colluding with pharmaceutical companies to ensure a dangerous experimental drug is injected into tens of millions of men, women and children, often leading to injury or death, in exchange for commission from those companies. Those who have had no reaction to the mRNA are guinea pigs under observation, as there is no long-term data.
The politicians responsible for that of course, are yet to face any kind of punishment. Meanwhile, our session invovled almost 10 people who have been incredibly put out financially and who have been threatened with points on their licence which would have led to increased insurance premiums; at a time when people are already struggling. Again: politicians kill people - no consequences; we supposedly potentially injure people - punishment.
It was incredibly difficult to see the justice through the hypocrisy.
Anyway, the session began with the trainer stating that many people believe that this stuff is a money-making scheme, but telling us it isn’t.
It’s worth noting that given recent revelations that many of the institutions that regulate our societies (including even the political parties, the monarchy and Britain itself!) are registered as businesses on Companies House. The very purpose of a business is to profit, so the statement about speed awareness activities not being about profit was as meaningful as someone dragged in off the street to inject with you with a “COVID vaccine” telling you it’s safe and effective.
A few years ago, one mainstream newspaper in the North printed an article talking about how a local constabulary relied on speeding fines to operate, since they didn’t receive enough subsidy from government to operate effectively.
When you consider the expenses and overheads involved in the business of speeding fines, you realise they need to factor in the cost of a van - a depreciating asset - the guy’s salary who drove it to the location, the equipment to calculate speed, and the administration and staffing required to issue fines and organise Speed Awareness Courses.
This then gives us an indication of how they reach the random sum of £73 that you pay to attend the course, and how much profit they must surely make on top of operating expenses.
Do we see the result of such profit in the environment around us?
Does the profit go into making life easier or more comfortable for us?
Of course not. It goes straight into the pockets of the greedy criminals we now recognise have hijacked our political system.
They know that, regardless of attendance on one of these courses, people will forever be caught speeding and therefore it is a business with perpetual profit. And that profit is squeezed from the populace of this country, straight into the pockets of those who have long-used behavioural manipulation to convince us that they - multi-millionaires - work for us, and that they have our best interests at heart.
We’ve been fools.
Even now, I believe, the profit from such unlawful schemes also contributes to the building of an authoritarian, digital infrastructure, similar to that of China. We’re being squeezed for the finance to build our own cage.
Funny how these vans made it back onto the street at such a time when we became aware of the multitude of ways that the government impoverishes us, including via crippling inflation.
As well as that, schemes such as this also serve to further a number of related agendas - e.g. discouraging people from driving, and thus keeping them generally closer to home.
On a psychological level, I recognised a few familiar patterns throughout the session too. Despite the fact we’d all been forced into this to avoid greater financial difficulty, and that we’d all paid to forcibly attend, there was still an effort made by many of the other members to “impress” the trainer, and conform to the culture he was being paid to create.
To elaborate:
When asking his leading questions about how our actions could have put others at significant risk, his responses would evoke an almost juniors-classroom response with people trying to give the best answer. I felt myself reluctant to counter the growing culture in the room by perhaps offering suggestions that when some of us find ourselves creeping over the imposed limit, it’s following careful judgement and conscious calculation. I’ve no doubt this would have provoked a response that would have allowed the trainer to rally the other participants against me, or perhaps even had me fail the course.
And in this recongition, I couldn’t help compare it with the psychological behaviour we’ve all witnessed over the last few years. Let’s not forget that the same government that pushed me into that Speed Awareness scam is the same one that employed our media to ensure we were collectively scared and divided during the COVID era.
For example, we know many people were not questioning the scientifically-proven harms that come with mask-wearing, and were instead physically confronting members of the community who hadn’t blindly followed the governments commands. In this classroom, albeit to a much lesser extent, I still found myself faced with such a sense of conformity and subservience.
Concerningly (and relative to that last point), the trainer also had a few slides on the topic of ‘how other people would feel about us’.
This was certainly familiar to me, as I was one of the people who refused a mRNA drug from Pfizer, then watched TV shows like Good Morning Britain asking their viewers if they should abandon their “unvaccinated” friends.
This part of the session had us all brainstorm how our friends, family or those of the hypothetical victims of our actions, would feel about us, drawing such answers from other session-members as, “They might feel ashamed of us, or disappointed”.
I have no doubt that this kind of emotional response was what pushed many people to inject themselves with an untested mRNA on the basis that they were told they’d be shunned by loved ones if they didn’t.
Finally, and to bring this writing to a close, I’ll comment on how the trainer brought our session to a close.
It ended with us going around the class and each being asked to tell the trainer what we’d learnt. This was done with him holding a pen and paper, and telling us that a tick would be given next to our name if we provided a suitable response.
Inevitably, we all gave a drone-like answer to ensure that our £70+ wasn’t stolen in vain.
It’s a small consolation to me to recognise that here, in 2023, Britain and other Western nations have never been so collectively aware that the societies we live in are not free whatsoever.
They are authoritarian, and our behaviour is shaped through manufactured pop culture, and the threats, fines, restrictions and punishment of multi-millionaire politicians who are not subject to same laws as us.
After three years of blatant tyranny, whereby members of our community have suffered actual harms at the hands of these vile politicians who are yet to receive any punishment, millions of people around Britain are mugged every day for supposedly potentially putting people at risk.
There is no justice in Britain, or elsewhere, and they won’t be until we finally rise up and demand that is we, the people, who determine how we live - not corrupt tyrants.